ShareThis Page

Greensburg promotes two police officers

Jacob Tierney
| Monday, March 12, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

Greensburg police officers Jason Gain and Shawn Denning were promoted from sergeants to lieutenants Monday night, filling out the police department's complement of senior officers for the first time in years.

City council unanimously approved both promotions, and Mayor Robert Bell swore both in at Monday's council meeting.

“That's two good guys there,” Bell said. “That gets us to full force now.”

The Greensburg Police Department's contract with the city says it must have 27 police officers, including three lieutenants and three sergeants.

It has not had enough lieutenants for several years because of a wave of nine retirements and resignations from 2014 through 2016, creating a shortage of experienced officers.

An officer must serve as a sergeant for at least a year before they can be promoted to lieutenant.

In May 2016, it had only one sergeant, and one lieutenant.

In 2016 and early last year the department promoted several patrolmen to sergeants, including Denning and Gain, with the intention of making another round of promotions after a year.

Sergeants make a base salary of $80,493 a year, plus an extra 1 percent for every year the officer has been with the department as longevity pay.

Lieutenants make a base of $81,928 a year, plus the same longevity pay.

Gain has been with the department since 2004, Denning since 2008.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-6646 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me