ShareThis Page

Greensburg officer injured while arresting man accused of 'huffing'

Renatta Signorini
| Tuesday, March 13, 2018, 1:06 p.m.

A Greensburg policeman was injured Monday while attempting to arrest a city man whose girlfriend reported he had been “huffing” from an aerosol-type can.

Charles Wingert, 44, allegedly mentioned grabbing the officer's gun while police were arresting him, according to an affidavit of probable cause.

Police arrived at the Madison Avenue home at 10;30 a.m. after a call to city dispatchers, according to an affidavit. An officer attempted to talk to Wingert, who police said became aggressive and stood chest-to-chest with the officer and demanded to be taken to jail, police said in the complaint.

During a struggle while trying to arrest Wingert, the Patrolman Kerry Dieter's flashlight hit the officer in the lip, splitting it open, police said. Two other officers arrived to help and one abandoned using a Taser after Wingert allegedly mentioned grabbing Dieter's firearm.

Wingert is charged with aggravated assault, disarming a law enforcement officer, resisting arrest and inhaling a solvent. Police seized two cans of Ultra Duster from the home, according to the complaint.Canned air is one type of inhalant, an everyday household product that is abused to produce a sense of euphoria and hallucinations, according to American Addiction Centers. Products like Ultra Duster contain compressed gas that is sprayed onto keyboards and into electronic devices to clear out debris and dust.

Wingert is being held in the Westmoreland County Prison on $75,000 bond. He did not have an attorney listed in online court records.A March 22 preliminary hearing is set.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-837-5374, or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me