ShareThis Page

Westmoreland County voter turnout hit 44% in special election

Rich Cholodofsky
| Wednesday, March 14, 2018, 10:27 a.m.
The Westmoreland County Election Bureau
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
The Westmoreland County Election Bureau

Westmoreland County voter turnout in Tuesday's special election for the 18th Congressional District reached 44 percent, election officials said.

Nearly 72,000 ballots were cast in the county, according to unofficial results released Wednesday by the elections bureau.

County officials predicted turnout would be about 30 percent for the special election in which it appears that Democrat Conor Lamb won a narrow victory over Republican Rick Saccone to complete the final months of the term of former Rep. Tim Murphy. The Republican from Upper St. Clair resigned from office last year amid a marital scandal; he was accused of suggesting to a girlfriend she have an abortion.

Voter turnout for the 2016 presidential election in Westmoreland County was 75 percent. Turnout in 2014, a midterm election year in which state voters also elected a new governor, was 45 percent in Westmoreland County.

As a national audience watched results from all or parts of four counties in District 18 — Westmoreland, Allegheny, Washington and Greene — results slowed to a trickle by 11 p.m.

Results from 191 of 193 voting precincts in Westmoreland County arrived at the courthouse for processing shortly after 10 p.m. and were posted to the website within minutes. Results from the final two precincts, North Ligonier and Latrobe's 2nd Ward, didn't arrive until about 11:30 p.m., elections bureau Director Beth Lechman said.

Lechman said Wednesday that the county, as it routinely does, waited to post a report of the final results that included the last two precincts until all of the county's 1,800 absentee ballots were processed and counted.

Those results were posted online at 11:57 p.m.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-830-6293 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me