ShareThis Page

Without ballistic vests, North Huntingdon emergency response team likely to disband

Joe Napsha
| Tuesday, March 20, 2018, 11:45 a.m.

North Huntingdon's special emergency response team, which is trained to respond to school shootings or police standoffs, will likely disband if it doesn't get new ballistic vests this summer, a team member said.

“This is a piece of equipment we can't do without. It is not frivolous,” Sgt. Jay McCurdy told the North Huntingdon commissioners recently.

The life expectancy of the 5-year-old bullet-resistant vests used by the team expires in June. Without new vests, McCurdy said “we probably will disband.” The team, which has about a dozen members, was formed in 2005, he said.

McCurdy said he received a quote from a vendor that would supply the vests for $33,700 through the state's cooperative purchasing agreement. The commissioners told him the township would have to advertise for bids because the cost is higher than the state's $19,000 limit on non-bid purchases.

Commissioners authorized advertising for bids for the vests Wednesday.

Commissioner Duane Kucera, a retired township police officer, said the vests that emergency team members wear have more protective plates than those worn by officers on regular patrol. The team members also undergo specialized training to respond to emergencies, Kucera said.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-5252 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me