ShareThis Page
Westmoreland

Philly man accused of hauling heroin through Mt. Pleasant Twp. wants $2.5M bond cut

Rich Cholodofsky
| Tuesday, April 10, 2018, 11:42 a.m.

The lawyer for a Philadelphia man arrested in February after police found $500,000 stowed in a hidden compartment of his Jeep wants a Westmoreland County judge to lower his $2.5 million bond.

David Manuel Mora, 22, was arrested following a traffic stop in Mt. Pleasant along the Pennsylvania Turnpike after police suspected his vehicle of operating with a malfunctioning brake light. Mora has remained in the Westmoreland County Prison since his arrest.

During a search of the Jeep, police found a hydraulic-powered door to a hidden compartment where a suspected 500 bricks of heroin were stored, according to court records.

The drugs were en route to the Pittsburgh area from the East Coast, police said.

In court documents filed Tuesday, Philadelphia defense lawyer Louis T. Savino Jr. said the bail should be lowered because his client has no prior criminal record.

“The defendant, moreover, is responsible for the financial and emotion (sic) support of numerous members of his family and his continued incarceration poses significantly undue burdens on those individuals,” Savino wrote.

Mora is scheduled to appear before Common Pleas Court Judge Rita Hathaway on May 30 for a formal court arraignment.

No date has been scheduled to address Mora's request for reduced bail.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me