ShareThis Page

Norwin faces yet another school budget deficit

Joe Napsha
| Tuesday, April 17, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

Norwin school officials find themselves in familiar territory as they work on a preliminary budget for next school year: possibly raise property taxes again or slash costs, in part by offering teachers incentives to retire.

Norwin faces a projected $2.36 million deficit for the 2018-19 school year — mainly from a $3 million increase in expected expenses, said Ryan Kirsch, Norwin's director of business affairs.

District costs next year are estimated at $71.7 million, with revenues projected to be about $69.3 million — an amount already padded by $100,000 from a reserve fund.

Kirsch's budget projection presumes no real estate tax hike and no staff retirements or resignations. At least two teachers will retire and one will resign at the end of the school year, he said in a recent budget overview before the school board.

If the district increased property taxes by 2.4 mills, the maximum permitted by the state, it would raise about $960,000.

In the last three years, Norwin has raised taxes to the state-allowed maximum, Kirsch said.

The district has raised property taxes each year since 2013-14. Real estate tax rates in North Huntingdon, Irwin and North Irwin increased from 69.1 mills to 77.6 mills over that time.

Robert Perkins, school board president, said there is time to make necessary adjustments before a budget must be approved by June 30.

State subsidies for basic and special education are less than adequate to meet operating costs, the district said.

The administration and board faced a $3.3 million deficit last year when preparing the 2017-18 budget. The current $68.6 million budget was balanced by raising taxes by 2.4 mills, a $52 increase in taxes for a property at the median assessed value of $21,630.

Kirsch said about $53 million, or three-quarters, of district expenditures are locked in to salaries and benefits. Salaries account for 46 percent of that total.

To reduce staffing, the school board approved offering early-retirement incentives for teachers. District officials want another six teachers to join the two already planning to retire.

Details of the incentives must be worked out with the Norwin Education Association, the union that represents teachers, Perkins said.

Central office administrators also will be eligible for a retirement incentive on a case-by-case basis. The board plans to review how many of the 16 long-term substitutes will become full-time.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-5252 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me