ShareThis Page

Murder trial set for Latrobe man accused of shooting classmate

Joe Napsha
| Tuesday, May 15, 2018, 5:33 p.m.
Zachery T. McGrath of Latrobe is charged in the shooting death of Daniel McNerny.
Zachery T. McGrath of Latrobe is charged in the shooting death of Daniel McNerny.

A man accused of fatally shooting a friend and former classmate in January 2016 during a drug deal and botched robbery in Latrobe is scheduled to go to trial on June 4, a Westmoreland County judge ruled Tuesday.

Zachary T. McGrath, 23, of Latrobe, will go trial before Judge Meagan Bilik-Defazio on first-degree murder charges in connection with the Jan. 19, 2016 shooting death of Daniel McNerny, 20, also of Latrobe. The judge set the date during a pre-trial conference with District Attorney John Peck and Public Defender Wayne McGrew.

McGrath's case has been severed from two co-defendants in the slaying, Colin Gearhart, 20, of Latrobe, and Austin Krinock, 20, of Johnstown. Gearhart and Krinock both face charges of second- and third-degree murder and robbery.

Gearheart and Krinock, who were 17 at the time of the shooting, have attempted to have their cases moved to juvenile court. Bilik-Defazio denied Gearheart's request and the judge heard arguments Monday by Krinock's attorney, Brian Aston, to have him tried as a juvenile. The judge has not ruled on Krinock's request to move his case to juvenile court.

McNerny was slain as he tried to fight a would-be robber waiting outside a St. Clair Street residence to steal drugs and money from two Allegheny County drug dealers. Police had determined that the two drug dealers were McGrath's target. McGrath allegedly conspired with Gearhart and Krinock to rob the two dealers.

McGrath, who was dressed in black and had covered his face with a ski mask, is accused of shooting the victim as McNerny was trying to disarm him. One of the shots hit McNerny as he attempted to crawl back inside the home, police said.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-5252 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me