ShareThis Page

Former North Huntingdon Verizon employee to stand trial in nude pic case

Paul Peirce
| Wednesday, June 6, 2018, 5:45 p.m.

A fired Verizon worker from North Versailles will stand trial in Westmoreland County for allegedly stealing a nude photo from a customer's cellphone by texting it to himself.

William G. Hickman Jr., 32, on Wednesday waived his right to a preliminary hearing on charges of invasion of privacy and harassment filed by North Huntingdon police following the Feb. 16 incident.

Neither Hickman nor his attorney, Ryan James of White Oak would comment about whether a plea bargain is in place as they departed North Huntingdon District Judge Wayne Gongaware's office.

Township police allege Hickman approached Jessica Lynn Rubright when she came to the Verizon store in North Huntingdon to transfer her Sprint account to her mother's Verizon Wireless account.

Officer Justin Wardman reported that Rubright told police that Hickman, then a Verizon Wireless “solutions specialist,” said he could transfer the data and save her fees Sprint charged for the service.

Hickman went through her photos and texted a nude image of her to his phone while he worked on the data transfer in another room, police allege.

Rubright said she received a message on her Apple iCloud account noting that the photo had been sent to a number that turned out to be Hickman's cellphone.

Wardman said Hickman waived his right to an attorney when asked about the incident and confessed to taking the photo without Rubright's permission, according to court documents.

Last week, Rubright sued Hickman and the Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless. Her lawsuit in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court seeks undisclosed compensatory and punitive damages.

The lawsuit alleges invasion of privacy and negligence on Verizon's part.

Attorney Kelly Iverson accompanied Rubright to Wednesday's hearing. Neither commented on the case.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me