ShareThis Page
Westmoreland

Pardons, Clean Slate program help erase criminal records in certain cases

Jeff Himler
| Wednesday, Aug. 8, 2018, 9:39 p.m.
jeff himler | tribune-review Lt. Gov. Mike Stack, speaking at the Pathways to Pardons meeting, said “We should let everybody clear their records if they’re doing the right things, if they’ve learned from their past mistakes. We’re the second-chance nation.”
jeff himler | tribune-review Lt. Gov. Mike Stack, speaking at the Pathways to Pardons meeting, said “We should let everybody clear their records if they’re doing the right things, if they’ve learned from their past mistakes. We’re the second-chance nation.”

Pittsburgh attorney Casey Mullen, a native of the city’s Lawrenceville section, spends most of his time helping criminal defendants.

In 1994, he himself was a defendant, arrested at Duquesne University, where he was a 19-year-old undergraduate selling drugs to support his own habit.

While completing parole and returning to studies at Duquesne, he decided to apply to the university’s law school but was repeatedly rejected.

“Law schools frown upon people who are on parole,” he said. “I was bitter. I was doing everything in my power to make amends.”

Then his parole officer suggested he apply for a pardon through the governor’s office. Gov. Ed Rendell granted it in 2009, and Mullen obtained his law degree in 2011.

Now, he not only represents others who are applying for a pardon. He speaks at events like Wednesday’s Pathways to Pardons meeting at the Westmoreland County Courthouse, which was attended by more than 30 people seeking information about the state’s pardon process.

Mullen said he speaks at such programs to inspire others to seek a pardon for a criminal record that may be a barrier to their life plans.

“It’s nice to say I’m not a felon,” he said. “It’s liberating. I’m no longer defined by that mistake.

“The solution isn’t perpetual punishment, prohibiting young, talented people from entering certain professions or fully contributing to our society.”

Lt. Gov. Mike Stack, who led Wednesday’s meeting, agreed.

“We should let everybody clear their records if they’re doing the right things, if they’ve learned from their past mistakes,” he said. “We’re the second-chance nation.”

Steve Burk, secretary of the Pennsylvania Board of Pardons, said the board has been working to reduce the length of the pardon process to about 2 1 2 years and is looking to simplify the application that must be purchased for $8. At a merit review session, the board determines if an applicant will be granted a full public hearing of his case. The recommendation, determined by a vote after the hearing, is forwarded to the governor for consideration.

Matt Franchak, Stack’s chief of staff, said the state’s Clean Slate program for sealing qualifying criminal records is another avenue available to those whose past infractions are a barrier. If a criminal record is sealed through the program, only law enforcement and certain state certifying boards would have access to it, he said.

More details about the state’s pardon process can be found at www.bop.pa.gov.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, jhimler@tribweb.com or via Twitter @jhimler_news.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me