ShareThis Page

Greensburg woman's ex-boyfriend charged in rape of child

Paul Peirce
| Thursday, Aug. 16, 2018, 1:39 p.m.
Corby Jo Kinzey, is brought into the office District Judge Chris Flanigan, in Greensburg, before her arraignment for alleged rape of a child, on Wednesday, Aug. 15, 2018.
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Corby Jo Kinzey, is brought into the office District Judge Chris Flanigan, in Greensburg, before her arraignment for alleged rape of a child, on Wednesday, Aug. 15, 2018.

The ex-boyfriend of a Greensburg woman accused of raping a 5-year-old boy and sharing a video of the act on social media was arraigned Thursday on charges of being an accomplice to the assault and urging her to record it.

Charles Jason Hunter, 32, also of Greensburg, is charged with rape, rape of a child, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse with a child and other counts. Senior District Judge Herb Mitchell denied bail and ordered Hunter be held in the Westmoreland County Prison pending an Aug. 30 preliminary hearing.

Detective John Swank alleged in court documents filed with District Judge Chris Flanigan that 24-year-old Corby Kinzey of Greensburg told investigators that she performed the sex act on the child and recorded the video after repeated requests from Hunter. Police arrested her Tuesday.

Swank said there were numerous text messages between the pair that substantiate her claim.

In an Aug. 10 text, Kinzey worried about “going to jail” if anyone discovered the plan, Swank reported.

“Hunter told her to calm down. Hunter then said, ‘Remember you agreed to this,’ ” Swank wrote.

Assistant District Attorney James Lazar urged Mitchell to deny bail for Hunter after investigators say he told Kinzey “that he might be able to make a few bucks” off the video.

Kinzey is being held in the county jail without bail pending an Aug. 23 preliminary hearing.

“This is the most disturbing, vile set of circumstances I’ve seen in the nine years I’ve been here, your honor. How two people could even discuss, let alone take a video of an adult woman having sex with a 5-year-old is beyond comprehension,” Lazar said. “I feel there should be no bond in order to protect society.”

Also Thursday, police arrested Hunter’s current girlfriend, Amanda Lynn Smith, 29, of Hempfield on a single count of disseminating a video of a sex act on a child. Swank reported that while Smith shared the video with Hunter’s mother, who immediately turned the video over to police, Smith made no attempt to report the illegal acts.

Swank reported that when police served a search warrant at Smith’s apartment in the West Hills Apartment complex, she informed police she had deleted the images.

“Smith said that the video had been sent to her via Facebook Messenger by an unknown person (Tuesday). She stated that her account had been hacked,” Swank wrote.

Swank said that he and police Lt. Rob Jones told Smith during the interview that they did not believe an anonymous person had shared the video with her.

Lazar also disclosed during a brief court proceeding that when officers arrested Kinzey at her West Pittsburgh Street apartment, “Hunter was in the basement, probably trying to get their stories straight in an attempt to stay out of trouble.”

Mitchell set Smith’s bond at $100,000 and ordered her held in the county jail.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me