ShareThis Page
Westmoreland

Change in paratransit funding, private vendors worries Westmoreland officials

Rich Cholodofsky
| Saturday, Aug. 18, 2018, 1:00 p.m.
Christian Tyler Randolph | Tribune-Review

A change to future operations of the state’s medical assistant transportation program could cripple Westmoreland County’s paratransit system, local officials worry.

“This could be devastating for us,” said Alan Blahovec, executive director of the Westmoreland County Transit Authority.

Instead of counties overseeing the program that provides free rides to low-income residents for medical treatments and appointments, the new state budget approved by state lawmakers and Gov. Tom Wolf could allow private vendors to take control.

The county transit authority operates Go Westmoreland, the paratransit system that provides free and subsidized rides for residents who participate in human services programs for handicapped, low-income and elderly riders. Last year, the program provided more than 195,000 shared rides to county residents.

Medical assistance is one of the five classifications of riders eligible for the paratransit system. It accounts for more than half of the transit system’s total usage and the program’s budget. The state funnels about $3 million to the authority for medical assistance rides, Blahovec said. The paratransit system’s total operating budget is about $5.5 million.

Without medical assistance funds, the future of the paratransit system — which relies on grouping passengers together for shared rides — could be in jeopardy.

“We won’t be able to provide countywide service if we lose half of our riders,” Blahovec said.

State Rep. Eric Nelson, R-Hempfield, said the program change was approved at the request of the state’s Department of Human Services. The agency contended it needed to revise how medical assistance transportation funds were doled out because of questionable billing practices by several counties, he said.

Those issues forced the state to repay the federal government about $10 million in penalties, Nelson said.

Westmoreland officials said there have been no improprieties and no questions about it’s billing practices.

Nelson said the impact of the program changes are still unknown.

“We don’t want this policy to slit our throats. If we have to fight this, we’ll fight this,” Nelson said.

The Department of Human Services will seek proposals this year from brokers to oversee the statewide program. Once a broker is selected, that firm will seek proposals from companies to run the medical assistance transportation programs in each county.

The transit authority can bid for the Westmoreland County contract, Nelson said.

Human Services is moving forward with the restructuring, agency spokesman Colin Day said.

“The department is in the process of developing a strategy for implementing this legislation,” he said. “Stakeholder input will be one of the first components of this strategy.”

Westmoreland County Transit Authority took over paratransit operations in 2014 to compliment the medical assistance program that it administered. After a rocky start marred by scheduling issues and customer service problems, authority officials said the paratransit system has operated smoothly for several years.

Still, costs associated with the program caused the authority to reduce service and increase rates. A 10 percent fare hike for paratransit riders is scheduled to start Sept. 1.

The authority also spent more than $2.5 million for new vehicles in its paratransit fleet. It currently uses 48 vans and small buses in addition to private vehicles owned by National Express Transit, the company hired by the authority to operate the system.

“This is all very frustrating,” authority board Chairman Frank Tosto said of the state changes. “We’ve worked really hard to make this program efficient.”

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or rcholodofsky@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me