ShareThis Page
Westmoreland

Video shows Westmoreland deputy sheriff's alleged campaign donation solicitation

Rich Cholodofsky
| Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

Video evidence from the public corruption trial of Westmoreland County Sheriff Jonathan Held was released Wednesday.

Lawyers for the Tribune- Review and WPXI-TV successfully argued that the public has the right to view the evidence presented in court this week as part of the prosecution’s criminal case against the sheriff. Senior Common Pleas Judge Timothy Creany of Cambria County, who is presiding over Held’s trial, granted the motion from the media companies and turned over a copy of the video.

Prosecutors contend Held, 44, of Hempfield directed his deputies and staff to perform campaign activities while on duty.

Witnesses said the video depicts Deputy Sheriff Vince Izzo in uniform as he drives a county car to the A&S Indoor Pistol Range in Youngwood, enters the store and solicits a donation for the sheriff’s campaign fundraiser. Held has disputed the charges and maintains his innocence.

Lawyers for the Tribune-Review argued the video’s public release is essential.

“Any ruling on access must bear in mind that this is a trial that involves serious allegations of public corruption where the public’s right to access and monitor the proceedings is most important,” according to the court motion filed by Tribune-Review lawyers David Strassburger and Kathryn Clark.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or rcholodofsky@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me