2 charged after 39 animals removed from Sewickley Township home | TribLIVE.com

2 charged after 39 animals removed from Sewickley Township home

Renatta Signorini

A Sewickley Township man and woman are facing numerous neglect charges after authorities removed 39 animals from their home, according to court papers.

Nicole Marzole, 39, and Karl Kuhn, 44, allegedly had rabbits, goats, ducks, cats and a dog and chicken at their Fifth Street home that were living in deplorable conditions, authorities said.

Charges were filed against the pair Wednesday.

A humane agent with the Humane Society of Westmoreland County received a report about the house in May and during a visit reportedly saw animals living in unsanitary conditions in a garage and outside area. Rabbit cages were filled with feces and urine, goats had little grass for grazing and ducks had no access to clean water, according to court papers.

“The smell was overwhelming and there were swarms of flying insects,” the agent wrote in court papers.

Marzole and Kuhn were given 10 days to remedy the situation, but the agent reported that the animals’ living conditions did not change. On June 3, she seized 29 rabbits, two goats, three ducks, a chicken, a cat and a dog. Two other cats were captured about a month later.

Township officials condemned the home because of poor living conditions. Two young children were living there and the Westmoreland County Children’s Bureau was called to help, officials said.

No court action has been scheduled. Neither Marzole nor Kuhn had an attorney listed in online court records.

Phone numbers for them could not be located.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.