3 West Newton brothers accused of theft by Rostraver sanitation company | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

3 West Newton brothers accused of theft by Rostraver sanitation company

Paul Peirce
1121191_web1_WEB-credit-card

Three Westmoreland County brothers who worked for the same Rostraver sanitation company are accused of theft for using company-issued credit cards to make dozens of fuel purchases for their private vehicles.

Zachary T. Williams, 29; Justin D. Williams, 19; and Brandon J. Williams, 21, all of West Newton, have been charged by Rostraver police with access device fraud, receiving stolen property and theft by deception for allegedly making dozens of personal fuel purchases totalling $1,200 that were charged to Bigs Sanitation Co. in Rostraver.

Sgt. Scott Sokol reported the trio made the purchases this year at gas stations and convenience stores in Belle Vernon, Monessen, Rostraver and Smithton. Sokol reported in court documents the sanitation company acquired videos of the men pumping fuel into their personal vehicles. Company officials notified township police last month.

A spokesman for Bigs said the men were terminated after the thefts were discovered.

Zachary Williams is accused of pumping $818 worth of fuel; Justin Williams, $239, and Brandon Williams, $223.

Sokol said in court documents that when questioned the brothers claimed they had been given company approval to make the fuel purchases. Company manager Harry Williams told Sokol “under no circumstances” were the men given permission to make personal purchases with a company credit card.

The men were charged via mailed summons from Rostraver District Judge Charles Christner’s office.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.