Appeal denied for Latrobe man convicted in fatal robbery attempt | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Appeal denied for Latrobe man convicted in fatal robbery attempt

Rich Cholodofsky
1810735_web1_gte-krinockmugWEB0101519
Westmoreland County Prison
Austin Krinock

The appeal of a Johnstown man convicted earlier last year of second-degree murder for his role in a botched robbery in front of his friend’s home in Latrobe has been rejected.

A three-judge panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court denied the appeal filed by Austin Krinock, who contended he received an unfair trial because of what he claimed was an improper method used to select the jury in his trial. Krinock also maintained the evidence against him was insufficient to warrant the guilty finding.

Krinock, now 21, was one of three men convicted in the January 2016 shooting death of 20-year-old Daniel McNerny. Westmoreland County prosecutors contended Krinock, upset over a verbal slight, conspired with two others to rob a Pittsburgh area drug dealer, but the plan turned deadly when a Good Samaritan, McNerny, attempted to intervene.

Krinock is serving a sentence of 34 years to life in prison.

The appeals court rejected Krinock’s contention that Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio did not allow his lawyer to question prospective jurors. Instead, the judge posed questions submitted by both the defense and prosecution.

Krinock also contended that, because he did not actively participate in the execution of the robbery nor was he directly involved in the fatal shooting, jurors should have found him not guilty of the murder charge.

“As stated by the trial court, the intent required for second-degree murder is inferred from Krinock’s intent to engage in a gunpoint robbery, and Krinock’s actions after he decided not to actively participate were insufficient to relieve him of liability for the tragic result of that robbery,” according to the appeal court’s ruling.

Prosecutors said Krinock purchased the gun used to kill McNerny and tossed a jacket from an upstairs window to the man who waited outside to commit the robbery.

The shooter, Zachary McGrath, 24, of Latrobe, in a separate trial was convicted of first-degree murder and was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. A third man, Colin Gearhart, 21, of Latrobe was convicted of third-degree murder and is serving a sentence of 10 to 20 years in prison.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.