Appeals court upholds decision to let Belle Vernon students attend prom |

Appeals court upholds decision to let Belle Vernon students attend prom

Rich Cholodofsky
Tribune-Review file
Belle Vernon Area High School

Eight Belle Vernon Area High School students cited this month for underage drinking can attend the prom Friday night, a state appeals court ruled.

The state’s Commonwealth Court issued that order late Thursday afternoon as school district lawyers challenged a county judge’s ruling from earlier this week that halted the expulsions. The expulsions would have barred attendance at the dance and graduation ceremonies next month.

“We believe the court misinterpreted the requirements for the discipline process,” said school attorney Ira Weiss. “The district has significant concerns about the impact this case has and its ability to enforce its discipline rules.”

After a closed-door hearing, Westmoreland County Common Pleas Judge Harry Smail Jr. issued a preliminary injunction to prevent the school district from enforcing 45-day expulsions of eight students, including four seniors who are poised to graduate June 5.

School officials said underage drinking citations issued to eight girls who attended a Relay for Life event May 3 in Charleroi warranted the expulsions that were doled out at internal discipline hearings last week.

Tom Rodriguez’s 18-year-old daughter, last fall’s homecoming queen, was one of the expelled students. He said the legal challenge filed against the district was in response to what he said was inconsistent discipline compared with shorter suspensions previously issued in other cases throughout the year.

“This wasn’t about getting them out of trouble. It was about getting them a punishment that was fair and what has been done in the past,” Rodriguez said. “If they had instituted 10-day suspensions, our girls would not be going to the prom and we would be OK with it. For the seniors, walking in graduation is the bigger deal.”

Weiss denied the claim that shorter suspensions had previously been issued in similar cases to the eight students cited this month.

“The district has had a specific policy with regard to discipline over the years and I’m aware of no selective enforcement of any rules,” Weiss said.

Lawyers for the district and the students Thursday separately filed court documents with Smail seeking to have him clarify his ruling and its impact on the prom. The judge’s ruling ordered students to return class Monday. Smail wrote that students are permitted to participate in “normal school activities.”

In making that ruling, the judge said it is likely the students would win their lawsuit seeking to overturn the expulsions based on claims that the district did not follow proper procedures in doling out the punishment. Smail also questioned whether the district had the right to punish students for an incident that did not occur school property and was not sponsored by the district.

Meanwhile, the district is seeking an expedited hearing before Commonwealth Court on whether the injunction will stand, a ruling that could still impact the student’s ability to participate in the graduation ceremony. No date is scheduled for the appeal hearing.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.