Belle Vernon School District seeks judge’s OK to sell former WCCC building to church | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Belle Vernon School District seeks judge’s OK to sell former WCCC building to church

Paul Peirce
1063385_web1_Rostraver
Google Maps
Belle Vernon Area School District has petitioned Westmoreland Common Pleas Court to sell the former community college building in Rostraver. Monongahela Valley C&M Church wants to purchase the building for $95,000, according to court documents.

The Belle Vernon Area school officials want permission from a Westmoreland County judge to sell the former community college building in Rostraver to the Monongahela Valley C&M Alliance Church.

Attorney Victor Kustra notified the court this week in a petition that Howard Hanna, the school district’s real estate agent, has a pending offer of $95,000 from the church to purchase the building and property along Fells Church Road.

The district acquired the four-acre property and one-story masonry building, which was built in 1990, for $1 in 2017 from Youngwood-based Westmoreland County Community College. WCCC trustees closed the Mon Valley branch campus that year because of declining enrollment.

The building has five large classrooms, offices, a lobby and restrooms. It also has 95 parking spaces. The property is located at the intersection of Fellsburg and Fells Church roads.

Kustra said the agent has shown the property 46 times since it was listed, and the school board feels the church’s offer “is the only legitimate offer received for the property.”

Under state public school code, districts can sell unused and unnecessary school buildings by private sale contingent on court approval. A hearing date on the sale has not been scheduled.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.