Charges dismissed against former Jeannette man accused of interfering with firefighters |

Charges dismissed against former Jeannette man accused of interfering with firefighters

Rich Cholodofsky
Keith D. Cerqueira of Trafford is accused of trying to get into his burning home on Division Street while Jeannette firefighters were working on Monday, Aug. 20, 2018.

Westmoreland County prosecutors Monday dismissed criminal charges against a former Jeannette man accused of interfering with firefighters as they attempted to extinguish a blaze at his home last year.

Keith Cerqueira, 59, now of Trafford, pleaded no contest to a lesser charge, a summary count of disorderly conduct, and was fined $300. In return, prosecutors dropped misdemeanor counts of interfering with emergency workers and institutional vandalism.

Police said Cerqueira attempted to enter the Division Street duplex Aug. 20, 2018 as firefighters worked for more than seven hours to put out the blaze that started in the basement of the building and moved into the home’s attic. Authorities also accused Cerqueira of destroying a toilet in a holding cell at the Jeannette police station after his arrest.

In court Monday, Cerqueira defended his actions.

“The cops slapped the cuffs on me. I was upset everything I own is gone. I don’t even have pictures of my missus,” Cerqueira said.

Following a hearing last year, Cerqueira explained he had lived on Division Street for more than 15 years and many of his possessions were still inside the burning home, including furniture, a safe and his wife’s ashes. He had been moving items out slowly after city officials told him he couldn’t live there anymore, he said.

Assistant District Attorney Jim Hopson said the more serious charges against Cerqueira were dismissed after he paid $300 in restitution to the Jeannette police department for the broken toilet.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.