Checkpoint to history: Berlin Wall falls, Cold War ends on Greensburg man’s watch | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Checkpoint to history: Berlin Wall falls, Cold War ends on Greensburg man’s watch

Stephen Huba
1913500_web1_gtr-CheckPoint2-110919
AP
Army Sgt. Michael Rafferty (right) with British and French soldiers outside Checkpoint Charlie in June 1990.
1913500_web1_gtr-CheckPoint3-110919
Courtesy of Mauermuseum
Army Sgt. Michael Rafferty (middle) holds a foundation stone from Checkpoint Charlie after a ceremony to decommission the famous gate dividing East and West Berlin.
1913500_web1_gtr-CheckPoint4-110919
Courtesy of Michael Rafferty
Army Sgt. Michael Rafferty (right) looks through a hole in the Berlin Wall with a West German policeman.

Three decades ago, on Nov. 9, 1989, U.S. Army Sgt. Michael Rafferty was at home in West Berlin when word came over the Armed Forces Network that East Germans would soon be able to travel unimpeded to the West.

The communist government announcement came after months of civil unrest and protests by East Germans seeking more freedom of movement.

Rafferty called one of his fellow noncommissioned officers at Checkpoint Charlie and asked whether anything was different. “No,” was the reply, so Rafferty went to bed.

The next morning, at 6 o’clock, he arrived at the famous checkpoint to a scene of pandemonium.

“I had to climb into the window of the checkpoint because I couldn’t get into the door,” Rafferty said. “It was a mess, and it stayed that way for weeks.”

Hundreds, if not thousands, of East Berliners were entering the western part of the city that had been closed to them since the 1961 construction of the Berlin Wall. They were coming through the wall at any checkpoint they could, Rafferty recalled.

“West Berliners came to the wall to celebrate. East Germans came across to visit — then they went back,” he said.

Rafferty, 53, of Greensburg, said his service as a military police officer at such a momentous time in history — the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War — has stayed with him.

“The checkpoint is a major part of my life. I enjoyed every second,” he wrote in a recent essay about his experiences. “The final chapters of the Cold War were being written, and I was there to help turn the pages. The whole event was like a dream.”

Rafferty’s reflections also are included in the new book “Checkpoint Charlie: The Cold War, The Berlin Wall, and the Most Dangerous Place on Earth” (Scribner, $30) by Iain MacGregor.

A retired sergeant first class, Rafferty is an administrative assistant for the U.S. Army Recruiting Company at Westmoreland Mall.

Rafferty grew up in Moreno Valley, Calif., and enlisted in the Army after high school in 1984. He went to military police school in Alabama and was sent to West Berlin in January 1988 with the 287th Military Police Company.

Rafferty worked as a patrol officer in the occupied city until his appointment to Checkpoint Charlie in March 1989. As one of four American noncommissioned officers in charge, he was responsible for maintaining access to East Berlin by Western military personnel.

“Because Berlin was still an occupied city at the time, we had certain occupation rights there, one of which was to control access to the city,” he explained.

Checkpoint Charlie was the most famous of three gates, or checkpoints, maintained by the U.S. and it allies during the Cold War. The others were Checkpoint Alpha and Checkpoint Bravo.

The site of a standoff between American and Soviet tanks in 1961, Checkpoint Charlie became increasingly important with the construction of the Berlin Wall that same year. President John F. Kennedy visited the checkpoint prior to giving his “Ich bin ein Berliner” speech in June 1963.

“The checkpoint was our response to the wall system, to maintain access rights and to maintain accountability (of military personnel going to East Berlin),” Rafferty said.

As the crowds grew on Nov. 10, Rafferty and his fellow officers did their best to maintain a modicum of order. More American soldiers than usual were coming through because of the long Veterans Day weekend. And Germans were creating a traffic jam on both sides.

At the end of his shift, Rafferty took the train home. On the train, he sat next to an East German father and daughter who were visiting from Potsdam.

“I asked them if this was their first time in West Berlin. They said, ‘Yes.’ I pulled my ‘Berlin Brigade’ pin off my sweater and pinned it to the young girl’s scarf. ‘Welcome,’ I said, looking at the father. He was definitely getting a little emotional,” Rafferty said.

The Berlin Wall gradually became more porous as people chipped away at it in the weeks and months that followed. The old Cold War checkpoints increased in number, and people were able to pass through with increasing ease.

“It made us totally irrelevant,” Rafferty said, remembering that he even heard the sounds of chisels and hammers in his dreams.

By March 1990, the NCOs at Checkpoint Charlie stopped monitoring people visiting East Berlin. June 22, 1990, was Rafferty’s last day at Checkpoint Charlie.

After the ceremony to decommission the checkpoint, a crane moved in to take the building away. Below it were loose cobblestones that the soldiers took as souvenirs.

“We picked up the foundation stones and walked into the East German checkpoint, handing the East German border guards the stones. They were smiling. It was all finally over,” he said.

Germany reunified on Oct. 3, 1990.

Rafferty first came to Greensburg as an Army recruiter in the late 1990s. He met his wife here and has lived in the city since 2003. They have two sons — Noah, 14, and Elijah, 13 — to whom he wants to teach the history he lived.

“I just want them to know their dad hasn’t always been lazy,” he joked.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.