ShareThis Page
Route 30 in Greensburg reopens after chemical spill cleanup | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Route 30 in Greensburg reopens after chemical spill cleanup

Patrick Varine
| Tuesday, March 12, 2019 10:06 p.m
873357_web1_gtr-Rt30spill1-031319
Patrick Varine | Tribune-Review
Fire foam covers eastbound Route 30 in Greensburg after a chemical spill on Tuesday, March 12, 2019.
873357_web1_gtr-Rt30spill2-031319
Patrick Varine | Tribune-Review
Firefighters used foam to combat fumes from a chemical spill on eastbound Route 30 in Greensburg on Tuesday evening, March 12, 2019.

Eastbound Route 30 reopened overnight near the East Pittsburgh Street ramps in Greensburg, after a driver apparently threw a jug of chemicals at another car in an apparent road-rage incident on Tuesday night.

The westbound lanes reopened around 11:45 p.m., according to Westmoreland 911 officials.

“The person threw a five-gallon jug of xylene out the window,” Hempfield No. 2 Fire Chief Tom Kline said.

Xylene is a chemical solvent, typically used as a paint thinner.

Neither of the drivers remained at the scene, Kline said.

“We’re going to have PennDOT come out and lay down some sand,” Kline said. “We used foam temporarily, to knock down the fumes.”

The incident happened shortly before 8:30 p.m., according to county emergency dispatchers.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, pvarine@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.