ShareThis Page
Commissioner Cerilli won’t comment on campaign money from dead man tied to massage parlor prostitution ring | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Commissioner Cerilli won’t comment on campaign money from dead man tied to massage parlor prostitution ring

Rich Cholodofsky
932313_web1_web-cerilli
Submitted
Westmoreland County Commissioner Gina Cerilli

Westmoreland County Commissioner Gina Cerilli on Monday refused to comment on $1,900 in donations her campaign received from a deceased family friend implicated in a human trafficking and prostitution ring at area massage parlors.

According to campaign finance records, Cerilli received four donations from Henry “Sonny” Caruso dating to 2015, including a $500 gift made in August.

Caruso, 49, of Mt. Pleasant committed suicide in November after he was suspended with pay from his job as a guard at Westmoreland County Prison. Cerilli, along with fellow commissioners Ted Kopas and Charles Anderson, voted for Caruso’s suspension. County officials said the suspension came after they were notified Caruso was part of an ongoing grand jury investigation into human trafficking allegations.

Criminal charges were filed last week against Caruso’s wife, Hui Xu, 44, and four others involving allegations of prostitution and human trafficking at five businesses in Monroeville and Murrysville. Caruso’s wife is the owner of four Tokyo Massage parlors where investigators said women were bused in from New York to work as prostitutes.

Sonny Caruso was named in the grand jury presentment. Investigators said his bank accounts were used to launder proceeds from the massage parlors, that he drove women from bus stops to work at the businesses and money from the criminal enterprise was used to pay for Caruso’s vehicles and his daughter’s college tuition.

Doug Chew, a Republican candidate for county commissioner, on Monday called for Cerilli to turn over the money Caruso donated to her campaign to organizations that fight human trafficking.

“People of this ilk should never be allowed to contribute into our political system. I’m frankly surprised that Ms. Cerilli, who is on the county’s prison board and knew Mr. Caruso was being investigated the month before his death, has not taken it upon herself to reject this donation to her campaign already,” Chew said.

Cerilli came to Caruso’s defense days after his death. During a public meeting of the prison board, she gave an emotional statement in support of Caruso, a man she then described as a friend, and attempted to have Warden John Walton fired for his role in investigating the grounds for Caruso’s suspension.

On Monday, Cerilli refused to discuss Caruso, his donations to her campaign or Chew’s call for her to relinquish the money.

“I’m not going to comment on anything Doug Chew says,” Cerilli said. “What he has to realize is he’s got to get through his primary before he faces me.”

Chew is one of seven Republicans seeking two party nominations. Cerilli and Kopas are unopposed for the two Democratic nominations.

A review of campaign finance reports dating back to 2015 found no other candidate for county offices received donations from Caruso.

While refusing to comment on Caruso’s donations to her campaign, Cerilli also declined to discuss her friendship with Caruso and his family.

“Out of respect for his daughter and wife, I won’t comment,” Cerilli said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, rcholodofsky@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.