Commissioners approve $85K settlement for Sheriff Held lawsuit | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Commissioners approve $85K settlement for Sheriff Held lawsuit

Stephen Huba
1227263_web1_gtr-sheriffheld-022818
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Westmoreland County Sheriff Jonathan Held.

Westmoreland County commissioners on Thursday approved the latest payment to settle a discrimination lawsuit against the county and Sheriff Jonathan Held.

They agreed to pay part-time sheriff’s Deputy Jonathon Sutton $85,000 to settle the lawsuit, which he filed in March 2018 in the U.S. District Court for Western Pennsylvania.

Sutton, a Marine Corps military policeman and reservist in North Versailles, filed the suit claiming he was repeatedly passed over for promotions since 2016 because of his service commitments.

It was one of three lawsuits based on military status discrimination that had been filed against the sheriff in 2018.

Held denied the charges and expressed frustration with commissioners’ policy of paying out-of-court settlements — a policy he said was keeping all the facts from coming out.

“This trend of handing out money is disturbing, as not one allegation in all of these cases has been verified under oath or with evidence,” Held said.

Commissioners declined comment on the settlement on Thursday.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.