Consumer advocate’s efforts recognized by Westinghouse retiree group | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Consumer advocate’s efforts recognized by Westinghouse retiree group

Patrick Varine
1328670_web1_gtr-bach-062419
Submitted photo
Mary Bach of Murrysville is presented with the Westinghouse SURE 2019 Lifetime Achievement Award by President Lucio Facchini.
1328670_web1_gtr-bach2-062419
Submitted photo
Mary Bach of Murrysville is presented with the Westinghouse SURE 2019 Lifetime Achievement Award by President Lucio Facchini.

Mary Bach of Murrysville was recognized recently for her work in consumer advocacy, by a group of Westinghouse retirees dedicated to community service.

Bach, who is also the chairwoman of the AARP’s Pennsylvania Consumer Issues Task Force, received the Westinghouse SURE 2019 Lifetime Achievement Award from the company’s Service Uniting Retired Employees (SURE) group.

Initiated in 1989 as part of President George H.W. Bush’s “1,000 Points of Light” program, SURE’s mission is to mobilize the expertise of Westinghouse retirees in Southwestern Pennsylvania through volunteer service to the community.

Since they began keeping a record, SURE volunteers have logged more than 1 million hours of volunteer service in the Greater Pittsburgh area.

Bach was recognized for her ongoing efforts to make consumers aware of the latest scams and to ensure that vendors are not overcharging customers for merchandise.

Bach is the first Westinghouse spouse to receive the award. Bach’s husband Leonard is a former Westinghouse employee.

The award was presented during SURE’s annual meeting and luncheon in Penn Hills.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.