Controller accused in $191K embezzlement scheme from Murrysville firm | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Controller accused in $191K embezzlement scheme from Murrysville firm

Paul Peirce
1492468_web1_web-money8

A federal grand jury this week indicted the former controller of a Murrysville packaging company, accusing her of embezzling $191,000 over five years.

Victoria Mazur, 51, of Plum, is accused of embezzling the money from Gateway Packaging Corp. between December 2012 and December 2017, U.S. Attorney Scott Brady said.

According to the eight-count indictment, Mazur embezzled the money by processing fraudulent refunds through the employer’s point of sale terminal, which is used to process credit and debit card transactions for customers.

“It’s really unfortunate. We’re a small business, and you put your trust in someone for a lot of years, and you turn around and discover something like this was going on,” said Scott Getty, Gateway Packaging vice president and general manager.

Getty said Mazur was hired in 2011 and left in March 2018 “citing health reasons,” he said.

However, Getty said Mazur’s successor discovered the alleged thefts.

Attempts to reach Mazur for comment were unsuccessful.

Brady said in a news release that the law provides for a maximum total sentence of 20 years for each count of wire fraud. The law also provides for a fine of $250,000 for each count.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Lee J. Karl is prosecuting the case.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service assisted in the investigation of the case, Brady said.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.