Cookie bakers announce sweet tally for Guinness World Record |

Cookie bakers announce sweet tally for Guinness World Record

Mary Pickels
Facebook | The Wedding Cookie Table Community
Monongahela Area Historical Society announces final Guinness World Record largest cookie table count.
Mary Pickels | Tribune-Review
Above, new bride and groom Danielle D’Amato, 33, and Samuel Craig, 35, of Poland, Ohio, pose with Guinness World Records adjudicator Christina Conlon and the certificate awarded to the Monongahela Area Historical Society on Aug. 11.

The bakers contributing cookies to the Monongahela Area Historical Society’s attempt to set a Guinness World Record for largest cookie table only had to exceed 18,000 cookies.

Instead, according to the final tally, their wedding cookie spread totaled 88,425.

That number was far north of the conservative “at least 50,000” Guinness World Record adjudicator Christina Conlon guessed during the city’s 250th anniversary celebration on Aug. 11.

Historical society President Laura Magone, founder of the Facebook group the Wedding Cookie Table Community, made the announcement Thursday afternoon.

“I had no idea what to expect. We knew we would do better than (18,000),” she said.

She was notified of the final number on Thursday morning and immediately put a signmaker to work.

The sign is hanging on Main Street, she said, and the framed certificate Guinness presented the city on Sunday likely will have a home in the historical society’s Longwell House.

Magone suspects the record will be challenged sooner rather than later.

“I’m very happy. Something inside of me tells me we are going to be defending the record,” she said.

For now, she’s thrilled with the win.

“It’s nice that it happened in a small town. There is a lot of excitement,” Magone said.

Mary Pickels is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-836-5401, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Food Drink | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.