Cops accuse ex-employee of Greensburg convenience store with burglary, theft | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Cops accuse ex-employee of Greensburg convenience store with burglary, theft

Paul Peirce
816792_web1_Police-lights

City police accused a former employee of a Greensburg convenience store of entering the business after hours and stealing hundreds of dollars.

Aaron P. Payne, 43, of Hempfield, is charged with burglary, theft and receiving stolen property in connection with entering the CoGo’s store at 219 East Pittsburgh St. at 2:39 a.m. Feb. 22, after it closed, and taking $443 from a filing cabinet. Authorities believe Payne used an old work key that he did not return after he was fired, Patrolman Reginald Harbarger reported in court documents.

Payne also was charged this week with escape and resisting police for fleeing officers who wanted to question him Monday about a weekend theft of $75 worth of deli meat and cheeses from Shop ‘n Save on East Pittsburgh Street. Police allege Payne was recognized on surveillance cameras as he left the grocery store without paying for the merchandise. He is charged with retail theft.

District Judge Chris Flanigan ordered Payne held without bail in the Westmoreland County Prison pending a preliminary hearing March 7.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.