Cops: Argument over beer in Southwest Greensburg results in stabbing, arrest | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Cops: Argument over beer in Southwest Greensburg results in stabbing, arrest

Paul Peirce
1819954_web1_Police-lights

A 42-year-old South Huntingdon man is in the Westmoreland County Prison after police say he slashed his younger brother’s leg with a knife during an argument over drinking beer.

Francis John Hermanson Jr. is charged by police with aggravated assault, simple assault, reckless endangerment and harassment in connection with the 1:39 p.m. incident Wednesday involving his brother, Robert J. Hermanson, 35, inside an apartment along Foster Street in Southwest Greensburg.

When borough police Chief C.J. Kent arrived, he said he found the younger Hermanson in the kitchen, sitting in a pool of blood with a “very large” laceration on the lower portion of his left thigh.

“(Robert) said he was feeling faint and felt like he was going out. I requested a bath towel to apply direct pressure (until) Mutual Aid arrived on the scene…,” Kent wrote.

Robert Hermanson was treated by paramedics and taken to Excela Health Westmoreland hospital in Greensburg, according to Kent.

Kent said Francis and Robert began a verbal argument over beer.

“The argument escalated to a physical altercation when Robert attempted to physically throw Francis out of the residence by pushing him out the door. Francis then retaliated by grabbing a knife and slashing Robert across his left thigh, causing a deep laceration,” Kent wrote.

Acting District Judge Charles Moore ordered Francis Hermanson held in the county prison after he failed to post $50,000 bond pending an Oct. 29 preliminary hearing before Hempfield District Judge Tony Bompiani.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.