Cops: Contractor used Trafford man’s credit card for $4,500 in personal purchases |

Cops: Contractor used Trafford man’s credit card for $4,500 in personal purchases

Paul Peirce

A contractor hired to complete home improvements to two rental properties owned by a Trafford man is accused by police of accepting a $1,000 down payment plus making $4,547 in unauthorized charges on a credit account without making any repairs.

Charles W. Murphy, 45, of Plum, was charged by Trafford police with theft, receiving stolen property, access device fraud and counterfeiting in connection with the thefts that allegedly took place between June 17 and July 7.

Patrolman Richard Adams reported the property owner, Konstantinos Koromvokis, told police he contracted Murphy to complete improvements to houses in Tarentum and Turtle Creek and gave him access to a credit account “with explicit instruction that it only be used to purchase materials.”

According to court documents, Koromvokis told police he discovered July 8 that Murphy had made multiple “unauthorized” purchases on the account for personal pharmacy bills, gas and fast food totalling more than $4,120 and another $628 at an area Home Depot for gift cards and personal tools.

Koromvokis told Adams that Murphy initially denied using the account, but “eventually sent Koromvokis a text message admitting to making the unauthorized purchases.”

Murphy could not be reached for comment. An attorney was not listed in court documents.

Murphy’s preliminary hearing is scheduled July 30 before Harrison City District Judge Helen Kistler.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.