Cops: Greensburg man accused of endangerment after 10-year-old fires loaded shotgun | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Cops: Greensburg man accused of endangerment after 10-year-old fires loaded shotgun

Paul Peirce
1068811_web1_AP19048459484070

A Greensburg man who left a loaded shotgun in a corner of his bedroom where it was picked up and accidentally fired by a 10-year-old boy earlier this month is charged by city police with endangering the welfare of children.

Robert D. Stevens, 33, was charged this week with District Judge Chris Flanigan via mailed summons filed in connection with the April 12 incident that happened in Stevens’ Moreland Street home.

Patrolman Chase Mollomo said officers were called to the residence about 3:45 p.m. after the youth discovered the loaded, unsecured shotgun leaning in a corner of Stevens’ second-floor bedroom and accidentally fired it. Police said Stevens was downstairs when the gun was fired.

Mollomo said the shot went through a dresser and two walls before coming to a stop. No one was injured.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled June 13.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.