Cops: Greensburg woman accused of assaulting girl | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Cops: Greensburg woman accused of assaulting girl

Paul Peirce
1660972_web1_Police-lights

An anonymous complaint to a statewide child abuse hotline led to charges being filed against a Greensburg woman.

Detective Sgt. John Swank charged Amarette L. White, 39, with child endangerment and simple assault after interviewing her and the alleged teen victim.

Swank reported in court papers that police received a complaint through ChildLine PA, a state child abuse reporting system, that a person suspected the teen was being physically assaulted by White.

In an interview Tuesday, Swank said the teen told police that she did not “like to be around White.”

In an interview Wednesday with Swank and patrolman Justin Scalzo, Swank reported in court documents that White admitted assaulting the teen.

White could not be reached for comment and an attorney was not listed in court papers. A preliminary hearing is scheduled Sept. 26 before District Judge Chris Flanigan.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.