Latrobe man accused of attempted homicide after stabbing caught on video |

Latrobe man accused of attempted homicide after stabbing caught on video

Paul Peirce
Westmoreland County Prison
Matthew Oliver, 29, of Latrobe, accused by city police of stabbing a man during an argument outside of Latrobe Manor Oct. 2.

A 29-year-old Latrobe man who told police Wednesday that his friend was accidentally stabbed in the chest during a fall is charged with attempted homicide after investigators obtained a surveillance video of the altercation.

Matthew Oliver is accused of assaulting a fellow resident in a patio area outside the nine-story Latrobe Manor apartment complex at 6:05 p.m. Wednesday. In addition to attempted homicide, Oliver is charged by city police with aggravated assault, stalking, simple assault and illegal interception of communications.

The 28-year-old victim, Daniel Lattanzio, was flown by medical helicopter to UPMC Presbyterian in Pittsburgh with a serious injury to his upper left chest, according to Detective Ronald Keslar.

Oliver was arraigned in night court by District Judge Joseph DeMarchis and ordered held in the Westmoreland County Prison after failing to post $250,000 bail.

Keslar said that when officers arrived at the scene near city hall, Lattanzio was laying on the patio “bleeding profusely from a stab wound to his chest.”

Witnesses told police they heard Lattanzio yelling for Oliver to leave him alone and a scuffle between the pair ensued on the patio.

Police questioned Oliver after he was treated and released from Excela Health Latrobe Hospital after allegedly being punched in the face by Lattanzio. Oliver told investigators Lattanzio was upset because Oliver had secretly made an audio recording of a conversation between the pair.

“Oliver said Lattanzio took off his shirt … and charged him,” Keslar wrote in court documents.

Oliver told investigators he pulled out the knife for protection, and Lattanzio threw him on the ground and fell on top of Oliver, causing the stab wound.

However, Keslar said surveillance video from a nearby building acquired by police Thursday showed Oliver repeatedly approaching Lattanzio, who was sitting at a picnic table, despite repeated attempts “to get Oliver to leave.”

Keslar said in court documents that Lattanzio engaged Oliver, who had displayed the knife, and the pair fell to the ground.

“At this time, Oliver is seen removing the knife from his pocket … Oliver is observed making a swinging motion toward (Lattanzio ’s) chest with the hand that had the knife,” Keslar said.

During a police interview at the hospital, Lattanzio said he did not immediately realize he had been stabbed.

“Lattanzio said Oliver has continually harassed him for the past month by coming to his apartment at inconvenient hours. He said he had filed a complaint with his building manager regarding the continued harassment by Oliver,” Keslar said.

“Lattanzio said he had recently learned from a mutual friend that Oliver had secretly recorded a conversation. He said he had informed Oliver that they were not friends,” Keslar wrote.

Police said Lattanzio suffered a punctured lung, severe blood loss and the knife wound “was close to his heart.” He had surgery Friday to repair his injuries “and remove blood from inside his lung,” Keslar said.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled Oct. 14 before Unity District Judge Michael Mahady.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.