Avonmore man accused of killing bulls with crossbow cited for damaging apartment | TribLIVE.com

Avonmore man accused of killing bulls with crossbow cited for damaging apartment

Paul Peirce

A man accused of shooting four bulls with a crossbow on a Loyalhanna Township farm during St. Patrick’s Day weekend was cited for causing a disturbance inside an Avonmore apartment house where he lives, state police said.

Shaun D. Ross, 60, was cited Thursday for criminal mischief and disorderly conduct in connection with a 3:40 a.m. April 20 incident in the 500 block of Westmoreland Avenue.

According to citations filed by Trooper Chad Howell, Ross “did run around screaming, activating fire alarms and also broke several doors.”

Howell reported that Ross caused more than $300 in damage.

Neither Ross nor public defender John Hauser could be reached for comment.

Ross has a preliminary hearing July 7 on unrelated charges of agricultural vandalism, ecoterrorism, aggravated cruelty to animals, criminal mischief, corruption of minors, criminal trespass and furnishing liquor to minors in connection with shooting four bulls.

The shooting occurred between 10 p.m. March 16 and 8 a.m. March 17.

State police said the injuries were so severe to two bulls that they were euthanized. Two other injured bulls still are recuperating, police said.

The deceased bulls were valued at $13,500, state police said.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.