5-month probe lands Mt. Pleasant Township man in jail on firearms charges | TribLIVE.com

5-month probe lands Mt. Pleasant Township man in jail on firearms charges

Paul Peirce

Following a five-month investigation, state police in Greensburg said they arrested a Mt. Pleasant Township man Thursday for illegal possession of multiple firearms including a AR-15 rifle and grinding off the serial numbers so they could not be traced.

Michael C. Lint, 33, was arrested by state police following the probe that began in January when Lint’s ex-girlfriend told troopers that she had given Lint four weapons including the AR-15 rifle, a .45 caliber handgun, a .410 pistol and a .308 rifle and scope but he refused to give them back after the couple separated.

Trooper John Beynon reported in court documents that Lint has been convicted of felony assault and theft, which makes it illegal for him to possess a firearm.

After troopers acquired a search warrant March 30 from District Judge Anthony Bompiani in Youngwood, police discovered the ex’s four firearms, plus another 9 mm handgun and a .380 handgun, numerous magazines and ammunition, according to court documents filed by Trooper John Beynon.

Beynon reported that the two handguns that were not his former girlfriend’s were both reported stolen in 2013 in Greensburg and Irwin.

During an interview, Beynon said that Lint denied knowing the handguns were stolen. Beynon said Lint also claimed his ex-girlfriend also requested him to “grind the serial numbers off.”

Lint is charged with multiple counts of receiving stolen property, illegal possession of firearms, altering firearm marks of identification and theft.

Lint was released on $25,000 unsecured bond pending a preliminary hearing June 6.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.