ShareThis Page
Cops: Mt. Pleasant woman was on drugs when she struck Walmart worker |

Cops: Mt. Pleasant woman was on drugs when she struck Walmart worker

Paul Peirce
| Friday, January 11, 2019 10:40 a.m

State police allege a woman was under the influence of multiple unprescribed drugs, including methadone and methamphetamine, last month when she drove into a row of shopping carts and seriously injured a Walmart employee in East Huntingdon.

Ronalee M. Bailey, 40, of Mt. Pleasant was arraigned this week before District Judge Charles Moore on three counts of driving under the influence of a controlled substance and single counts of aggravated assault by vehicle and reckless driving following the Dec. 6 crash in the parking lot.

Trooper Bradley Ditzler reported in court documents that when he arrived at the scene about 11 p.m. at the Summit Ridge Plaza, “Bailey appeared to be asleep with her head resting on the steering wheel.”

Ditzler reported that Bailey also had an 8-year-old girl in the front seat of her car.

When the trooper woke the driver by knocking on the driver’s window, Ditzler said “Bailey’s speech was slurred and rapid” and she denied being under the influence of any alcohol or drugs.

Ditzler said the female victim had already been taken by ambulance to Forbes Hospital in Monroeville for treatment of multiple injuries, including a fractured nose and back.

Ditzler reported that Bailey was arrested and taken to Excela Frick Hospital in Mt. Pleasant for blood toxicology tests.

Bailey was released on recognizance bond pending a preliminary hearing Jan. 23.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.