Cops: Rostraver police K9 Duvall helps nab two burglary suspects | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Cops: Rostraver police K9 Duvall helps nab two burglary suspects

Paul Peirce
1764880_web1_Duvall
Rostraver Township Police.
Rostraver Township officer Joseph Spinola with K9 Duvall.

Rostraver police K9 officer Duvall was credited Friday with helping township police locate and arrest two suspects during a daylight residential burglary.

Todd Houseman, 43, of Monongahela, and Mack Simms, 47, of Monessen, were awaiting arraignment in night court on multiple charges of burglary, criminal mischief, criminal conspiracy, criminal trespass, theft and receiving stolen property filed by police.

Police reported in a news release that just after 10 a.m., officers were dispatched to a call of a burglary in progress to a residence on Salem Church Road, where the owners were not home.

Reports said when the first officer arrived, he spotted a man standing in front of a window. Police said when the suspect saw patrol cars arriving, “he concealed himself within the residence.”

Police called Duvall and his handler, officer Joseph Spinola, and surrounded the residence.

After the suspect refused to surrender after multiple police commands, Duvall and officers entered the residence and Duvall located Simms hiding in a closet, police said.

When police announced they were going to release Duvall to locate other potential suspects, Houseman surrendered without incident.

During the course of the investigation, police said they learned Houseman had entered the same residence Sept. 28 and later pawned $10,000 worth of jewelry he allegedly stole.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.