Cops: Unity woman coerced teen into making false sexual assault claim | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Cops: Unity woman coerced teen into making false sexual assault claim

Paul Peirce
1624132_web1_Police-lights

A Unity woman is accused by state police with coercing a teenage boy to make a false sexual assault complaint.

Christina D. Hall, 38, of the village of Hostetter, is charged with making false reports of child abuse and corruption of minors by state police in Greensburg.

Trooper James McKenzie alleges that Hall told the child to make a false sexual abuse allegation against an individual in Greensburg.

“… Hall threatened, if (the teen) did not make this allegation, she would kill (the accused person) by shooting them or burning their house down,” McKenzie wrote in the complaint.

McKenzie reported that the teen made the allegation against the individual, but recanted it it shortly after being questioned by authorities.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled Oct. 10.

Hall could not be reached for comment. An attorney was not listed in court documents.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.