Jeannette woman accused of assaulting boy during argument over cellphone |

Jeannette woman accused of assaulting boy during argument over cellphone

Paul Peirce

A Jeannette woman was arrested Wednesday after she allegedly assaulted a boy under 12 years old during an argument over a cellphone, city police said.

Nicole L. Gogolsky, 39, was charged with simple assault, false imprisonment, reckless endangerment, possession of drug paraphernalia and criminal trespass. She was arraigned before District Judge Joseph DeMarchis and ordered held in the Westmoreland County Prison after she failed to post $5,000 bail.

Patrolman Derek Manley said he responded to a report about 7:30 p.m. of a juvenile being assaulted in the vicinity of South Fifth Street and Chambers Avenue.

Manley said he found Gogolsky and the juvenile on South Sixth Street and the juvenile “had abrasions on his right knee, dried blood on his face and around his nose.”

The juvenile told Manley that Gogolsky took his cellphone from him, alleging it contained inappropriate content. Manley said the juvenile also alleged Gogolsky “tackled him” and refused to return the phone.

Manley said in court documents that Gogolsky was questioned about the boy’s injuries, “which she could not provide an answer to.”

Relatives of Gogolsky who live in the area told police she was not permitted to be on the property. Manley said he confiscated a metal pipe used for smoking contraband from Gogolsky during the incident.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.