Rostraver woman, 86, identified as victim in Route 51 accident |

Rostraver woman, 86, identified as victim in Route 51 accident

Courtesy of Rostraver Central Volunteer Fire Department
Rostraver police and firemen responded to this fatal accident Wednesday along Route 51 near the Gallatin Road intersection. The driver of this car was reportedly killed in the 10:45 a.m. collision.

A Rostraver woman was killed Wednesday when her car collided with a tri-axle truck on Route 51 in the township.

Police identified the victim as Anna Mae Selembo, 86. Authorities said her 2004 Toyota Camry was struck by a tri-axle truck at the highway’s intersection with Gallitin Road about 10:45 a.m. She was dead at the scene.

The Westmoreland County Coroner’s Office said Selembo died of blunt force injuries It ruled that her death was an accident. Selembo was not wearing a seat belt and her car’s air bags did not deploy, the coroner said.

Authorities said the section of the road remained closed for more than three hours while authorities investigated.

Police said Selembo’s car was traveling north on Gallitin Road, stopped at the intersection and then crossed over the northbound lanes of Route 51, where it was struck by the tri-axle truck. Police said the 2003 Peterbilt tri-axle, driven by Roy Waggoner, 61, of Monongahela was headed northbound.

Police said Waggoner was not injured.

An investigation indicated that Selembo’s car “drove directly into the path of the tri-axle, which resulted in the accident,” police said.

Officials said they do not believe cell phone use played a role in the crash.

Township police were assisted at the scene by the state police accident reconstruction team, Rostraver and West Newton EMS, Rostraver Central Fire Department, the county detective forensic investigator and West Newton Police.

Trib Total Media staff writer Natasha Lindstrom contributed to this report.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.