Westmoreland County candidates will be available for Q&A | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Westmoreland County candidates will be available for Q&A

Megan Tomasic
1774334_web1_vote-1804596_1920--3-
Tribune-Review

Voice of Westmoreland, a nonprofit organization that promotes racial, economic and educational equity in the county, is hosting a candidate fair Tuesday, giving the public an opportunity to meet Republican and Democratic candidates in several local races.

Candidates for county commissioner, county row offices, Superior Court, Court of Common Pleas, Greensburg mayor and city council and some school boards will be available for questions at the Lamplighter Restaurant near Delmont.

Those who attend will have the opportunity to meet one-on-one with candidates.

“It’s difficult to get information on local races. Not knowing what some of the offices do makes it even harder,” Sarah Skidmore, volunteer leader for the organization, said in a news release. “Having an opportunity to talk with the candidates in one place is incredibly helpful.”

The fair runs from 5 to 7 p.m. The general election is Nov. 5.

Voice of Westmoreland held events leading up to May’s primary election.

In April, the organization asked county candidates to answer a series of questions focused on issues impacting working families, education, livability, taxation and diversity.

“We are excited to provide folks in our community with the chance to talk with many of our local candidates so they can be more informed before they vote on Nov. 5, especially for these important local races that often get ignored,” Voice of Westmoreland co-founder Angela Aldous said in the release.

Megan Tomasic is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 724-850-1203, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.