Crowded GOP field looking to survive primary, reclaim majority on Westmoreland commissioner board | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Crowded GOP field looking to survive primary, reclaim majority on Westmoreland commissioner board

Rich Cholodofsky
1122131_web1_web-elections
1122131_web1_gtr-chew
Submitted
Douglas Chew
1122131_web1_Heather-Cordial
Submitted
Heather Cordial
1122131_web1_gtr-fritz-51219
Submitted
Patricia Fritz
1122131_web1_gtr-RonGazze-051219
Submitted
Ron Gazze
1122131_web1_kertes
Submitted
Sean Kertes
1122131_web1_kosko
Submitted
Paul Kosko
1122131_web1_gtr-VentreRun2-011119
Submitted
John Ventre

When Republicans in 2011 won the party’s first majority on Westmoreland County’s Board of Commissioners in more than 60 years, it appeared the GOP was finally ready to take over the political landscape at the top of county leadership.

But Democrats took back control of the board four years later. And now Republicans are again seeking to reclaim the majority — though apparently with little hope of coordinating a team effort.

“I am the only one who has experience and knowledge of county government,” said Sean Kertes, 32, of Greensburg. “All of the other candidates are talking about things on the state and national level, not on the county level.”

He serves as chief of staff for Commissioner Charles Anderson, the lone Republican on the board who will retire at the end of the year. Anderson, originally appointed to the board in 2008, was part of the GOP’s majority when he and Republican Tyler Courtney won seats on the three-member board in 2011.

Kertes is one of seven Republican candidates vying to replace him. The others are: microbiologist Doug Chew, insurance program director Heather Cordial, former Chief Deputy Sheriff Patricia Fritz, dentist Ron Gazze, computer information specialist Paul Kosko and retired business executive John Ventre.

All but Gazze are making their first runs for elected office.

The top two vote-getters in both political party primaries on May 21 will run in November’s general election for three seats on the board of commissioners. Democratic incumbents Gina Cerilli and Ted Kopas are unopposed in the primary.

Most of the Republican field has cast Kertes as an incumbent and, in doing so, challenged Anderson’s record as commissioner. Anderson has endorsed Kertes.

Kertes conceded it’s still very much up in the air the possibility of a coordinated Republican campaign to reclaim the party’s majority if he’s one of the GOP nominees this fall.

“(Other Republican candidates) are threatened by my knowledge and experience. I would like to have a Republican majority, but we have to be on the same page,” Kertes said.

So far, that doesn’t appear to be the case.

Chew said he won’t team with Kertes. Ventre, Cordial and Kosko suggested that such a partnership would be difficult.

“The party is really separated in this race. A lot of people are not getting along right now,” Cordial said.

During the early stages of the campaign, Chew, Ventre and Cordial coordinated some attacks against Kertes and the Democratic incumbents but have not declared any formal team-ups. Neither Fritz nor Gazze, who twice before ran for commissioner as an independent and a Republican, have participated in any joint campaign messaging.

Each of the candidates said their messages can stand out in the large field.

Priorities cited

Chew, 48, of Hempfield, a former faculty member at the University of Pittsburgh medical school, said he would work to hold the line on county property taxes and look for additional sources of revenue to ease deficit spending.

“My goal is to not increase taxes, but the current board put us in a position where we may not be able to avoid it,” Chew said.

Ventre, 61, of Hempfield called himself a “Trumplike” candidate who said he will look to sell off county assets as a means to balance budgets.

“My plan is to quickly get our assets appraised and see what we can sell,” Ventre said.

Kosko, 57, of Hempfield said he wants to leverage federal money to improve local infrastructure.

“I’m not the status quo guy,” Kosko said. “If you want the status quo guy, don’t vote for me.”

Cordial, 39, of Hempfield, who also serves as a master sergeant in the Air Force Reserves, said she will oppose any efforts to raise taxes.

“We are for the people but, at the end of the day, we are all human and I want a happy, safe community to live in,” Cordial said.

Gazze, 69, of Greensburg said he will focus on job creation.

“I think it’s an advantage that I ran before,” Gazze said. “My opponents may have more political support, but I have support from the public.”

Fritz, 65, of Mt. Pleasant did not return calls seeking comment.

Raising questions

A former PennDOT supervisor who worked in the sheriff’s office since 2014, Fritz was fired last year after being convicted of a summary harassment offense in connection with a physical confrontation with a union official and having been named in several discrimination lawsuits filed against the department.

She has denied any wrongdoing and is appealing her conviction.

Ventre also had to defend himself during the early stages of the campaign for racially insensitive comments posted on social media. Ventre previously said those comments were taken out of context and said he apologized for the posting.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland | News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.