Delmont firefighters say criticism from council hurts fundraising, recruitment | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Delmont firefighters say criticism from council hurts fundraising, recruitment

Paul Peirce

Delmont firefighters say an ongoing rift between the department and borough council has stymied fundraising and recruitment efforts.

“It’s completely unnecessary, but they keep bashing our fire department,” said Rich Balik, Delmont fire chief. “We’ve been trying to build this department back up for two years after the past problems … and (council) keeps bringing up the past, and it’s hurting us.”

The department provides coverage for 2,500 people and a portion of Route 66. It survives on community donations and fundraisers such as raffles, fire hall rentals and bingo events, said Balik and Bill Walk, a fire department captain and trustee.

“We usually raise $8,000 to $10,000 on the two or three gun bashes a year we hold,” said Balik, noting the one on Aug. 24 raised just $2,500.

Walk said council has not allocated any tax money to fire department operations in recent years. A request to institute a fire tax was rebuffed by council.

Council designates several thousand dollars a year from its local service tax to the fire department, council president Andrew Shissler said. The borough paid $8,575 to cover worker’s compensation insurance for firefighters, council Vice President Bill Marx said. That payment is required by state law.

In light of mismanagement allegations levied in 2018 against four former fire department officers charged with theft, the community and council deserve more transparency from the department, Marx said. Shissler also thinks more transparency is needed concerning fire department operations.

Former fire Chief Logan Clark, 36; his wife, Heather Clark, 36; former fire department treasurer Jason G. Thomas, 38; and Timothy Bucciarelli, 61, have denied that they used department funds for personal benefit and are awaiting trial. A review of nearly four years of department finances led to allegations that the group misspent $60,000, according to court documents.

The accused have since been replaced in the department, and no one currently with the department is accused in the case.

Also in 2018, the borough’s longtime secretary-treasurer was accused of spending nearly $44,000 of taxpayers’ money on personal expenses. Karen Shola, 68, of Pittsburgh, pleaded guilty in May and repaid $40,000 at that time.

Siren sound-off

In recent weeks, a post on a Delmont community social media site raised the volunteers’ ire. It questioned the volume on the decades-old fire siren outside the station off Route 66 and the duration of alarms.

Marx confirmed he posted the message that also linked to an Oct. 10 Tribune-Review article about Hempfield residents’ similar concerns over the decibel level of the siren at the West Point Volunteer Fire Department.

“It’s been an issue brought before council before, and I posted it hoping to start a community discussion,” Marx said. “If they’re paranoid about it, so be it.”

Marx, who lives within earshot of the siren, said firefighters often do not immediately respond to the station, causing the blaring siren to repeat a three-minute cycle. There is available technology to remedy the problem, he said.

A year ago, Marx published an article in an area weekly newspaper saying fire department leaders refused council’s efforts to document how the department maintains its equipment and trains firefighters and to divulge its financial records.

“They also do not even attend council’s public safety meetings,” he said.

“We have about 17 active members, and we all have jobs,” Balik said. “Council has these meetings at 9 a.m. I’ve asked them to move it to night, but they won’t.”

Shissler said he doesn’t think council is “picking” on the fire department.

“We have received several complaints from residents about the siren … that it is too loud and continues too long and have spoken with the (the fire department) about that issue,” Shissler said.

Based on complaints about the siren, Balik said he looked into the issue and found replacing the controller would cost “about $5,000.” He said the siren is supposed to automatically turn off after four minutes, but residents allege the repeat cycle often continues much longer.

“The new equipment would reduce the time cycle, but not the decibel level,” Balik said.

Such an expense isn’t a priority, he said.

“We just don’t have the money for that,” Balik said. “We’ve got to pay our utility bills. Our rescue truck has to be certified… That will be over $3,500 with repairs.”

Don Cline, first assistant chief and department president, agreed there is not enough money for the siren when there are “more vital” equipment and vehicle needs.

“We don’t have that kind of money. Our newest ladder truck is from 1993,” Cline said.

Balik said department officials and borough council met last year to try to resolve issues.

“I was hoping … we could have moved on, but (council) hasn’t,” he lamented.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .


1855340_web1_Delmont-siren
Paul Peirce | Tribune-Review
Residents have complained that the siren outside the Delmont Volunteer Fire Department is too loud and sounds for too long.
1855340_web1_Delmont-First-Assistant-Chief-Don-Cline
Paul Peirce | Tribune-Review
Don Cline, Delmont Volunteer Fire Department president and first assistant chief.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.