Delmont man gets prison time for molesting girl |

Delmont man gets prison time for molesting girl

Rich Cholodofsky

A Delmont man will serve up to 10 years in prison for sex crimes against a girl.

Alberto Marton, 46, pleaded guilty Friday to 10 charges related to the sexual assaults of a now 13-year-old girl who claimed she was repeatedly molested for nearly two years.

Police said Marton repeatedly fondled and groped the victim starting when she was 9. According to court records, he also admitted that he took sexually explicit photographs of the girl.

Marton pleaded guilty to five felony counts of aggravated indecent assault and other related offenses.

He told Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court Judge Rita Hathaway he agreed to the plea bargain because he was guilty.

“I am sorry for what I had done,” Marton said.

Hathaway said Marton could have been sentenced to decades in prison if he was convicted in a jury trial.

The deal approved Friday called for Marton to serve 5-to-10 years in prison and additional five years on probation. He will also be subjected to lifetime registration as a convicted sex offender once he is released from prison.

Assistant District Attorney Adam Barr said the deal was made in an effort to spare the child victim from having to testify at trial.

Marton, since his arrest, had been free on bond. On Friday, he was taken into custody to begin serving his prison sentence.

Police, in court documents, said Marton told investigators “he had a mental block, and the assaults “must have occurred more than once.”

The victim’s mother and step-mother both told the judge the sexual assaults will have lasting effects.

“We’re doing our best to help her through this, but she will never fully recover,” said the girl’s stepmother.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.