Delmont Visionary Committee works with IUP students on possible Heritage Trail routes |

Delmont Visionary Committee works with IUP students on possible Heritage Trail routes

Patrick Varine
Submitted map
This map shows the most feasible option for extending the Westmoreland Heritage Trail from Export to Delmont. It was created by three IUP students, who earned scholarships for their work.

Members of the Delmont Visionary Committee would like to bring the Westmoreland Heritage Trail as close to the heart of the borough as possible.

Whether that is the trail, itself, or a spur that connects to Delmont’s downtown area, was the subject of a project that saw committee members working with Indiana University of Pennsylvania students, who have earned the Smart Growth Partnership’s Jack Robertshaw Fellows Award for their efforts.

“We did sort of a story map,” said Sara Ritter of Leechburg, a senior at IUP pursuing a degree in cartography and geographic information systems. “It’s an online way to look at the trail maps. We did a field study where we took a GPS unit and recorded barriers like telephone poles and things like that.”

The students developed mapping and analysis of alternative routes for the trail to take. Ritter worked alongside students Heather Lash of Muhlenberg and Austyn Diaz of Shillington.

The group evaluated several routes. One took advantage of higher elevations and avoided most privately owned properties, but that option crossed Old William Penn Highway, which committee members would like to avoid if possible.

A second route came right through Delmont’s downtown historic district, but with issues such as private property and barriers including fencing, trees, mailboxes and houses, the team deemed the route “too dangerous for the creation of a bike and walking trail.”

The recommended option was a route that comes into town along Church Street, before veering back north along Freeport Street, crossing Route 66 and passing through the Westmoreland Conservancy’s Morosini Nature Reserve. It follows Turtle Creek briefly and runs parallel to Old William Penn Highway before a few quick north-south detours as it heads into downtown Export. It also provides for the possibility of a trail spur along Greensburg Street.

Ritter said the biggest challenge in mapping a successful route is land ownership.

“If it’s a lot of private landowners, there could be a lot of issues getting approval from residents,” Ritter said.

The other challenge is the expense of creating a way for pedestrians to cross Route 66 safely, which will likely require either a pedestrian bridge or a tunnel underneath the road.

In anticipation of future costs, Delmont Visionary Committee member Annamarie Stackiewicz said the committee is accepting donations through the Westmoreland Heritage Trail.

“Checks can be made out to the Westmoreland Heritage Trail, with ‘Delmont Visionary’ on the memo line,” Stackiewicz said.

The group also created a Facebook page.

“I’ve been talking to PennDOT and they’re going to help us as well,” Stackiewicz said. “We have to show the maps to them as well and see what they think about it.”

The committee’s next meeting is at 7 p.m., June 6 at the Delmont borough building, 77 Greensburg St.

Ritter, Lash and Diaz all earned scholarships as a result of their selection as Robertshaw Fellows.

For more, see

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.