ShareThis Page
Deputy seeking Republican nomination for Westmoreland sheriff | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Deputy seeking Republican nomination for Westmoreland sheriff

Rich Cholodofsky
805486_web1_gtr-felder-022719

Steven Felder, a Westmoreland County deputy sheriff, will make his third bid to run the office he has worked in for the last 25 years.

Felder, 55, of Penn Township, announced Tuesday he is seeking the Republican nomination for sheriff. Two-term Republican incumbent Jonathan Held previously said he will seek re-election this year.

“I’ve learned good lessons and bad lessons about how to run the office from the previous sheriffs. It’s just time for me to step up and take a leadership role as the head of the office,” Felder said.

Felder serves as a corporal in the warrant division. Since 2008, he has been the president of the Westmoreland County Court-Related and Court-Appointed Association, the union that represents deputy sheriffs and other county workers at the courthouse.

Felder has a bachelor’s degree in criminology with a minor in psychology from the University of Pittsburgh.

With Felder’s candidacy, two current deputies in the sheriff’s office are now seeking to replace Held. Deputy Sam Pilato, 56, of Hempfield, also plans to run in the GOP primary for the position.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.