Derry burglary suspect accused of leading police on 9 mile chase | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Derry burglary suspect accused of leading police on 9 mile chase

Renatta Signorini
1680701_web1_web-handcuffs9

A Loyalhanna Township man is accused of breaking into a Derry Borough home early Sunday and then leading police on a nine mile chase, according to court papers.

Clark Headrick, 30, was arraigned Monday on charges of burglary, fleeing from police, reckless endangerment and several other offenses. He was being held at the Westmoreland County Prison on $50,000 bail.

Derry police said they were dispatched to an East Second Avenue home just before 4 a.m. after a reported break-in. While on the way there, an officer saw a maroon Chevrolet Silverado that matched the description of the suspect’s vehicle, according to court papers.

Police began to pursue the truck south on Route 217 and onto Route 30 eastbound. The chase ended when the truck crashed into a creek near Blue Hole Lane. Police said Headrick fled on foot.

A woman who lives at the borough home told police she had kicked Headrick out a week earlier. Headrick allegedly pushed through a window air conditioning unit to get inside, according to court papers.

He scuffled with the occupants, went into an upstairs bedroom and then fled, police said.

Headrick did not have an attorney listed in online court papers. A preliminary hearing is set for Sept. 25.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.