ShareThis Page
Derry Township constable ordered to stand trial on theft, extortion accusations | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Derry Township constable ordered to stand trial on theft, extortion accusations

Renatta Signorini
898881_web1_gtr-constablearrest
Renatta Signorini | Tribune-Review
Brian William McDowell, 35, is led away from his arraignment Friday, Jan. 18, 2019.

The situation seemed to make sense at first for a Hempfield man who gave a Derry Township constable $2,000 last year for a purported shooting competition.

Matthew Sellers signed up for what he thought was a couple sponsorships and gave Brian McDowell, 35, some extra cash to fix a scope on the gun McDowell claimed to be using in the competition, Sellers testified during a preliminary hearing Monday.

Sellers got emails from a person known as “Sgt. Alex Ridlock” providing updates about the competition.

“That’s what made the thing seem pretty legit, because it wasn’t just Brian, it was some other individual involved,” Sellers testified.

Investigators allege McDowell pocketed nearly $12,000 by collecting money for the purported competition and from others who he claimed had warrants out for their arrest.

District Judge Mark Bilik ordered McDowell to stand trial on numerous theft, extortion and official oppression charges following the all-day hearing. McDowell remains free on bail in three cases.

Police accuse McDowell of taking money between April and December from 23 people and attempting to get cash from seven others. Many of them testified Monday that McDowell requested payments to erase warrants that didn’t exist or “freeze” the system to prevent other law enforcement from making an arrest.

He won a six-year term as constable as a write-in candidate in the November 2015 election to represent Derry Borough’s Ward 4. County voting records show McDowell was elected with one vote.

Westmoreland County courts have been suspended from using McDowell as a constable until the case is resolved. McDowell has said he was getting substance abuse treatment.

During Monday’s hearing, he shook his head and took notes as victims took the witness stand. His attorney did not offer any argument.

Some victims testified they sought out McDowell to help with legal matters. Michael Rose of Derry testified he requested McDowell’s assistance in retrieving belongings from a former residence. McDowell charged him $350.

“He said it was normally $400-something, but he said I’d get a discount if he met me and paid him cash,” Rose testified.

When Rose eventually didn’t need McDowell’s help after all, McDowell directed Rose to “Sgt. Alex Ridlock” to get a refund, according to testimony. Rose said he hasn’t gotten his money back.

Other victims said they were contacted by McDowell through the Facebook Messenger app. Sara Halula of Latrobe testified she “panicked” when McDowell said there was a warrant out for her arrest for $312 in unpaid fines. She paid McDowell $437.25, which Halula testified included what McDowell described as “constable fees.”

“He acted like he was helping me out,” she said. “He told me he had my case froze in the system so other cops couldn’t look at my file.”

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, rsignorini@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.