Elderly Greensburg woman sues grocery store over buggy-related broken bones, other injuries | TribLIVE.com

Elderly Greensburg woman sues grocery store over buggy-related broken bones, other injuries

Rich Cholodofsky

A Greensburg woman has sued a local grocery store, claiming she was injured by a malfunctioning shopping cart.

Johnetta Battistoni, in a five-count lawsuit, contends that while shopping at the Pittsburgh Street Shop ‘n Save market in Greensburg in early October 2017 the wheels of her small push cart stopped then suddenly released, propelled her forward and caused her to fall violently to the floor.

Battistoni, 90, suffered a broken left hip and left leg, multiple bruises and a shock to her nervous system, injuries that required her to undergo emergency surgery from which she is still recovering, according to lawyer Steven Engel.

“The cause of the cart stopping isn’t the point here. The point is that it was bad. The store has an obligation to make sure the products they are offering the public are reasonably safe,” Engel said.

The store’s owners could not be reached for comment on Friday.

According to the lawsuit, Battistoni claimed she had placed several items into her cart and when she attempted to push it forward its wheels would “suddenly and unexpectedly seize-up or stop moving.”

Battistoni contends the store owners were negligent in failing to properly assemble, maintain and repair its shopping carts.

Shopping cart injuries have been the subject of previous lawsuits around the country.

In 2016, a jury near Cleveland awarded $1.3 million in damages to a woman who claims she was injured when struck by a motorized cart at a Giant Eagle supermarket.

A Connecticut woman won a $258,000 award following a jury trial in 2011 for an incident in which she claimed she was injured when the wheels of her shopping cart at a Kohl’s store had stopped.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.