Hempfield engineering firm donates $4,215 to Habitat for Humanity | TribLIVE.com

Hempfield engineering firm donates $4,215 to Habitat for Humanity

Joe Napsha
Tribune-Review File
Seton Hill University students Molly Carbone (in red jacket) and Olivia Gennaro assist Central Westmoreland Habitat for Humanity at a house renovation project in Hempfield Township in February as part of “Take the Day On” in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. CME Engineering donated $4,215 to help the local Habit for Humanity’s efforts.

The employees of CME Engineering LP of Hempfield recently donated $4,215 to Central Westmoreland Habitat For Humanity in Hempfield.

The donations were raised through CME Cares! — a program in which the CME employees come together to help others and give back to their communities.

CME, a multi-faceted engineering consulting firm specializing in civil, mining and environmental engineering, selected Habitat For Humanity “for putting God’s love into action, bringing people together to build homes, communities and hope,” the company said in a statement.

Habitat for Humanity helps homeowners build their own homes alongside volunteers and pay an affordable mortgage.

This is the sixth year CME has provided local non-profit organizations with contributions from its employees. CME Cares! program has donated more than $58,000 to organizations serving the areas within which CME operates. The company also has an office in Somerset.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.