Fire guts vacant East Huntingdon farmhouse |

Fire guts vacant East Huntingdon farmhouse

Jeff Himler
Everson Volunteer Fire Company
Firefighters battle a fire as it causes the partial collapse of a house Thursday, March 7, 2019, off Water Street in East Huntingdon.

No one was injured Thursday night when fire gutted a stone farmhouse in East Huntingdon.

Firefighters battled the blaze from outside since the building was fully engulfed when units arrived, East Huntingdon Fire Chief Brian Kite said. Half of the second floor collapsed, he said.

The fire was reported around 6:20 p.m. along Hyskell Farm Lane, off Water Street, by a neighbor who saw smoke and flames coming from the second floor, according to county dispatch.

A state police fire marshal listed the cause of the fire as undetermined on Friday, Kite said.

He said the dwelling is vacant and is owned by waste hauler Republic Services.

According to Edward Jesus, general manager of Republic Services in Scottdale, the house has been vacant since the previous owner died in November.

The company “will work with the township to determine the future of the farmhouse,” Jesus said.

Traffic was halted Thursday on a nearby stretch of the Southwest Pennsylvania Railroad while units from East Huntingdon, Scottdale, Mt. Pleasant and Everson fire departments battled the fire.

Firefighters cleared the scene at about 8:30 p.m. Some units returned shortly after 11 p.m. to douse a smoldering board, Kite said.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.