Ex-Franklin Regional student working on plea deal in connection with cyber attack | TribLIVE.com

Ex-Franklin Regional student working on plea deal in connection with cyber attack

Rich Cholodofsky
Michaela Gabriella King, 21, is charged with unlawful use of a computer and intentionally causing a disruption of a computer system.

The lawyer for a former Franklin Regional High School student charged with initiating cyber attacks that disrupted school and government computer systems throughout Westmoreland County in 2016 said in court Friday that plea bargain negotiations are progressing.

Michaela Gabriella King, 21, of Murrysville, is awaiting trial on felony charges of the unlawful use of a computer or communications device.

Prosecutors contend King, then an 18-year-old senior, uploaded a computer program to the school’s system that caused it and other linked systems to crash.

Investigators said that virus caused computer crashes at schools and other entities that used a central server system supplied by the Westmoreland Intermediate Unit, including Derry Area, Greater Latrobe, Greensburg-Salem, Ligonier Valley, Kiski Area, Burrell, Jeannette, Greensburg Central Catholic, Monessen and Hempfield, as well as the Greensburg Catholic Diocese and Westmoreland County government.

Defense attorney Lyle Dresbold asked Common Pleas Court Judge Tim Krieger to delay King’s trial for at least two months.

“We’re negotiating and hopefully we will get to a point where there is a resolution,” Dresbold said.

Krieger granted the two-month delay and scheduled King to appear in court in June for a status conference on her case.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.